Science and Science Fiction: The Cold Equations

January 19th, 2008

From time to time I’ll write about the courses I’m teaching, at least when I think it’s interesting behind the scenes. It should be this semester.

Last year and this year both I’ve started my Science and Science Fiction class with “The Cold Equations,” a famous proto-hard sf story by Tom Godwin. My course is nominally a physics course with a goal of teaching science and science communication through science fiction in its various forms, but I don’t start with a very deep physics lesson (although later in the course we do focus on Newton’s Laws as applied to spaceships). I want to start with a discussion of the philosophy of science in juxtaposition with humanistic sensibilities. This story historically has generated a lot of discussion and strong feelings, and that’s what good literature should do (whether or not the prose is particularly literary). One website going into this discussion about this story is here, although there have been a lot of stories, essays, and discussions in a lot of venues.

With minimal introduction, we read the original short story in class Wednesday. Its intent, from my perspective, is that the laws of physics have no emotions, no human qualities, and ignorance of them will get you killed no matter how innocent or tragic the situation. But the story has flaws of various sorts, and moreover some people just don’t don’t want to accept this thesis. (Reminding me about forbidden story themes.) The story can be read in different ways, and it’s certainly a complex, emotionally charged situation with high stakes that leads to critical thought.

I followed up this year with the 1996 movie version. It’s padded out a bit, but more importantly for my purposes, changes the story in a way to clearly highlight some of the humanistic objections and flaws of the original.

The course assignments are: read “Think Like a Dinosaur” by James Patrick Kelly, which is a modern high-quality humanistic response to “The Cold Equations,” and to write a 3-4 page response to the two versions of the original story and Kelly’s reaction, focusing not on the science but just on emotional reaction. I’ll start teaching science (beginning with light) next week, but want to get critical thought and engage both hemispheres of the brain and talk about the metatext of stories. We’ll have an hour of discussion before switching topics, and hope for some thoughtful responses. (That’s a hint if you’re in my class and reading this blog!)

I have a special affinity for “The Cold Equations” because I once met Tom Godwin’s daughter at an Armadillocon back in the 1990s and she spoke with me at length about her father and the story. When I told another Clarion West class mate about this, she asked me, “How much did she weigh?”

Share/Bookmark

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.