Sunday Starlinks

May 6th, 2012

The problem with some conservatives is that they have no intellectual integrity.  They value loyalty, faith, and their side above reality and honesty.  Don’t agree?  Here’s proof: a new Heartland Institute effort to discredit global warming.  More at Bad Astronomy.  I bet a lot of serial killers believe reasonable things — intelligence and ethics are not coupled in such individuals.  Horrors!  Here’s the lesson:  try to use only arguments that you yourself find convincing.  On the issue of climate, if your argument is not scientific in nature, it can be dismissed without any consideration as bogus, stupid, and offensive to thinking people everywhere.  This is not a scientific argument.  The Heartland Institute are being stupid assholes and this is proof that they lack credibility.  These deniers have jumped the shark.  (And I understand the ads are being pulled.  Too late.  We’ll remember.)

And here’s some good and bad journalism.  Guess which is which.  Wind farms causing global warmingWind farms not causing global warming.  Hint: the second story came out after a spate of bad stories like the one at the first link.

Back to more serious things…like the Avengers movie, which was really pretty damn good!  First, if you haven’t seen it, you should know that there’s an end scene after the credits.  No, after the first set of credits and the first extra bonus scene, and after the second set of credits.  So stay late if you want a little laugh.  And Scarlett Johansson wants to make a Black Widow movie.   From what I’ve seen so far, it could be great and it wouldn’t be hard to top Elektra or Catwoman.  Superhero movie fans will go see a movie with a female lead if it doesn’t suck!  And how about Ant-Man (and the Wasp?) in the Avengers sequel?  Cracked tells us why it sucks to be Ant-Man, unfortunately.  Finally, Five Ways the Avengers Bend the Laws of Physics.  Only five?  Not the best article, in my opinion, but a starting place for analytical thought about superheroes if you want to go down that dangerous path.

Analytical thought can weaken faith and induce doubt in the religious.  Duh!  But things that seem to be obvious need to checked out scientifically, because our intuition is far from perfect, and the analytically inclined realize that!  Another way to derail the many religious off their hate train, and get them to reduce their intuitive distrust of those analytically thinking atheists is to remind them that atheists are still watched by secular authorities, if not a god.

Oh, and here’s a winner from the intuitive woo-spouting mindless writer that lacks analytical thinking entirely: Darwin was wrong: why we need to update our model of evolution.  Warning for anyone who knows anything about evolution or science in general: it’s not pretty, and includes abuses of quantum mechanics to support a new age god consciousness.

Game of Thrones is a great story and TV show.  But what’s with those screwed up seasons?  How might they be explained scientifically?

Hmm…should I grow a bat-stache?

Really cool video graphically showing exoplanets discovered via transits (thanks Rachel!):

 

Share/Bookmark

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.