• Spider Star

    Spider Star

    The human colony on the planet Argo has long explored and exploited the technology left behind by an extinct alien race. But then an archaeology team accidentally activates a terrible weapon...
    Read More.

  • Praise for Star Dragon

    Spider Star

    "Seldom does a storytelling talent come along as potent and fully mature as Mike Brotherton. His complex characters take you on a voyage that is both fiercely credible and astonishingly imaginative. This is Science Fiction."
    -- David Brin

    "Star Dragon is terrific fare, offering readers a fusion of hard science and grand adventure."
    -- Locus Magazine

    "Star Dragon is steeped in cosmology, the physics of interstellar travel, exobiology, artificial intelligence, bioscience. Brotherton, author of many scientific articles in refereed journals, has written a dramatic, provocative, utterly convincing hard science sf novel that includes an ironic twist that fans will love."
    -- Booklist starred review

    "Readers hungry for the thought-provoking extrapolation and rigorous technical detail of old-fashioned hard SF are sure to enjoy astronomer Brotherton's first novel."
    -- Publishers Weekly

    "Mike Brotherton, himself a trained astrophysicist, combines the technical acuity and ingenuity of Robert Forward with the ironic, postmodern stance and style of M. John Harrison. In this, his debut novel, those twin talents unite to produce a work that is involving on any number of levels. It's just about all you could ask for in a hardcore SF adventure."
    -- Paul di Fillippo, SCI-FI.COM

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Meta

Monday Starlinks

September 10th, 2012

I took the weekend off, more or less, although I accomplished a few things.  We had a little drama at the end of last week buying a car for Jean Thursday night (a nice red 2010 Chevy Impala) and then getting into an accident with it on Friday evening (no one hurt, their fault with an unsafe U-turn).  Extra stress, extra things to do, although not that bad in the grand scheme of things.  It reminds me even a minor real life problem is much more important than getting upset about people who are wrong or simply offensive on the internet.  Doesn’t mean I won’t keep poking at some, but it is a reminder to work on constructive things rather than wasting time on people you probably can’t change.

Like Todd Akin (R-eally?!), who accepted a fictional offer Bill Nye never made to debate creationism.  A satirical piece following Nye’s call not to indoctrinate children results in a call to debate Akin at the Kentucky Creation Museum.  I don’t know if this is a win-win or a lose-lose, but you don’t actually debate creationists because they already know the truth and are just there to deny and assert.

And did you agnotology is the art of obscuring the truth?  I doubt Akin uses that word even if I’m sure he’d practice the art debating Nye.  Don’t confuse agnotology with skepticism even though those using it would like you to, and some who call themselves skeptics in good faith actually are agnotlogists (global warming skeptics/deniers).  I’m a little dismayed at the level of denial in the comments to the article, claiming “nothing in common” between the campaigns of Big Tobacco about the dangers of smoking and the current campaign against climatology sponsored by Big Oil…when there are a number of people agnotologists who have been paid to do both (e.g. see Heartland Institute and collaborators).

Meanwhile climate science marches on…unfortunately with increasingly bad news and “terrifying new math.”  (To give a nod to Bill Clinton, a lot of conservative/libertarians, like economics deniers, don’t do their arithmetic.)

More numbers…MILLIONS of black holes out there (with some quotes from an old collaborator of mine). I have job security.

Don’t hoax.  It can get you killedMe am bigfoot, not you.  (The book in the second like is awesome, BTW.)

Philosophy vs. Science.  Got to agree with Krauss here.  If you’re going to answer questions and have some reliability in the answer, you have to go with science.  If you don’t care about the answers and want to ask questions that science can’t (yet) address, then I don’t care what you do as long as you don’t pretend you’ve got reliable answers.

Then there’s science in progress and bungled science, which Mitt Romney goes in for.  I blame the Utah connection.  There may be something interesting going on with cold fusion experiments, but if you want to trumpet your science credentials I wouldn’t lead with it.

Let me also encourage you to consider sponsoring Uwingu, which ends its fundraising campaign on Friday.  I’m a sponsor myself and think we need to explore alternate funding for space science and education, and there are some good people involved.



You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.