July 21st, 2008
First off, The Dark Knight set a record for an opening weekend, with a $155 million domestic box office (previous record holder, for the record: the less deserving Spider-man 3 with $151 million). I was part of that $155 million, finally seeing the movie last night. We got our tickets before going out to dinner, which was smart, because it sold out. The 8pm show in Laramie, WY on a Sunday night sold out. So, I liked the movie, very much. It was darker and more realistic with most superhero movies, keeping in line with the elements that have made Batman popular in recent years. I won’t go into any details that will be spoilers for the three of you who didn’t see the movie yet. Despite the movie being being two and a half hours long, I think they needed another fifteen minutes or so to clean up some missing bits that made some parts mildly unsatisfying. Director’s cut should be good.
The firehose is wide open on tor.com now. Lots of good blog posts by all sorts including John Scalzi, Beth Meacham (my editor), and others.
io9 chronicles five ways that reality went sci-fi so far this century.
And here we have a six-figure book deal for an autobiography of a woman who sees angels. Ridiculous crap. Why is business compelled to give people want they want? And why do so many want it? People like Lorna Byrne, the author, are probably honest and believe what they say (and there are many others who are just lying con artists), but few of them are ever subjected to scientific tests, and of those that are, none have ever passed.
Larry King talks about allegations that UFOs have caused missile misfires (video link).
The American Physical Society’s Forum on Physics and Society calls for papers and commentary on the science behind anthropogenic global climate change. I’m uncomfortable with this from several perspectives. I wouldn’t be wild about groups of climatologists debating the science behind solar nucleosynthesis, which was somewhat controversial in the context of the solar neutrino problem. I’d also be concerned about us physicists debating the science of evolution, which some scientists also don’t agree with. Moreover, there is the fallacy of false balance in evidence here. Two sides, with two responses. Sure looks like the physicists are split 50/50 on this issue, at least to outsiders. Anyway, I’m disappointed with the APS as the public perception cannot set a good example of science in action.
Phil Plait at Bad Astronomy discusses whether or not you can see more stars from space.
Science Not Fiction provides a list of the ten best science fiction movie endings. Nice post to bookend my own list of the ten worst science fiction movie endings.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
<