November 18th, 2008
In support of the request for the input for the ScienceOnline09 science fiction panel, and wearing my science blogger hat…
Questions for Science Bloggers
I read it, watch it, and write it, too. My favorite on TV right now is Battlestar Galactica, although it has its flaws, and I watch Heroes, although the “science” is laughable. Waiting to see if Life on Mars fully hooks me. I haven’t seen what I would consider a really good science fiction film released in many years — Gattaca and Contact are two that come to mind. I have my top ten list of my own favorite sf movies.
As for writers, I have one list posted on my website and happily keep finding others. John Scalzi’s Old Man’s War was my most recent happy discovery. My shortlist of current writers I like would have to include: Scalzi, Vernor Vinge, David Brin, Robert Sawyer, Robert Charles Wilson, Joe Haldeman, Nancy Kress, Michael Swanwick, Eric Nylund, Robert Reed, Jack McDevitt, and many more.
I don’t need my science fiction to be so-called “hard” science fiction. I just need it not to be blatantly stupid or fantasy without clearly being fantasy. I mean, too many space-based science fiction stories ignore the laws of physics, and common sense, as it is. I enjoy true fantasy from time to time, and read the Harry Potter books with great enthusiasm like many others.
People learn from story, too easily. Anecdote trumps science all too often in the minds of many. Why not put out some stories that get the science right? People who are not in a position to take a class, or who won’t pick up a textbook, still turn on their TV. There’s a real opportunity that hasn’t been exploited. We need people to start caring about science in the same way they already care about society. What I mean by that sentence is that if you read a story or watch a TV show in which the characters behave unrealistically, the result is unsatisfying. Right now people read stories or watch shows that are supposed to be realistic, and what we’ve learned from science about how things work has no relationship to what happens. And people shrug, and say, “It’s just a movie, dude. Chill out.”
It’s both a matter of achieving a base level of scientific literacy in the public, and making people care about it. I’m optimistic that people are realizing that we are now living in the future, in a science fiction world, in which cyberspace, cloning, and space tourism are realities. Computers and obscure mathematics control our economics, and basic research and engineering control our prospects for energy alternatives. We had all better care about this stuff.
As for the harm, well, there has been a lot of discussion about that, too, following Buzz Aldrin’s comments that unrealistic and unscientific science fiction has dampened interest in the space program. I don’t think his case is overwhelming, but I agree that science fiction has an effect and it isn’t always positive, at least to the public at large that isn’t already a fan of science and discovery.
I’m trying to do my part by founding the Launch Pad Astronomy Workshop for Writers. I bring in about a dozen popular writers, mostly but not all science fiction writers, and teach them about modern astronomy. The goal is to have more astronomy, particularly correct astronomy, presented to the public through the works of the authors. Some of the attendees have written very popular media tie-in books and even books that have been made into movies. The potential is there to reach millions with some good science, or at least some material that isn’t as riddled with misconceptions or outright errors.
I’ve developed and taught an entire course about physical science starting from science fiction. Even good, motivated science students react enthusiastically when science fiction is used to introduce particular topics. On my blog, my most popular posts tend to be science fiction I love or hate because of the quality, or lack thereof, of the science.
I’ve also edited an anthology of science fiction stories featuring astronomy designed to be used in an introductory astronomy class. Diamonds in the Sky is coming to life, and should be all the way live by sometime in December, 2008.
Mine, www.mikebrotherton.com, for starters, which contains posts like the Hard SF Writer’s Bookshelf and Online Astronomy Resources for Writers, with sidebar links to my favorite useful and interesting blogs. These include astronomy-oriented blogs that also touch on science fiction from time to time: Centauri Dreams, Bad Astronomy, and Cosmic Variance. For one stop-shopping on the science-fiction side, www.sfsignal.com is my pick.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
<
November 19th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
I think this is an important point. Most people I know who aren’t trained as scientists have nonetheless absorbed a lot of science (good and bad) from the media. Add to the media mix the people who active trying to distort science for political or religious reasons, and many people are understandably confused.
Thanks for adding to the discussion!
November 19th, 2008 at 3:56 pm
[...] Questions about Science and Science Fiction: My Science Blogger Answers [...]
November 19th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
[...] pull in another comment on this subject. This one comes from scientist and science fiction writer Mike Brotherton, one of those responding to the ScienceOnline09 questions. I really don’t mean to pick on [...]
November 22nd, 2008 at 12:41 am
[...] quotes…It’s science fiction, not science class « FROM A SCI-FI STANDPOINT on Questions about Science and Science Fiction: My Science Blogger AnswersQuestions about Science and Science Fiction: My SF Writer Answers | Mike Brotherton: SF Writer on [...]